| Articles |
|
| Activities of IARFC India |
|
| Not enough hands to manage millionaire boom at home |
|
|
|
|
 |
|  |
|
|
|
|
Financial Adviser Commissions Banned in
Britain
|
|
|
|
This action is not unique to
Britain
. Similar actions have been taken in
Australia
,
India
and
Canada
. In many cases similar legislation has
been drafted that would apply to all financial products, including all forms of
insurance. Will these waves reach the
US
and other countries? The answer is,
“Probably Yes.” If similar legislation
were adopted, who would continue to sell the products needed by the public? Would the market penetration begin to dry
up? “Yes, that has already started
happening in other countries” according to advisors in Australia and India.
Which organizations in the
US
might favor this? Possibly those who are
already compensated on a fee basis, such as NAPFA’s 2,000 members and those
banks and credit unions that compensate their representatives on a salary basis.
|
|
|
|
What’s happened in
Britain
, and Why?
|
|
|
|
The
Financial Services Authority (FSA) is to ban financial advisers from receiving
commission for selling investment policies from 2012.
The change will change radically the sale
of financial policies.
The decision is a revolutionary change for the financial services industry.
Commission payments have been at the
heart of mis-selling scandals involving policies such as mortgage endowments and
personal pensions. This is the public
motive for the ban.
According to the FSA, "New rules... will remove commission bias from the sale of
retail investment products. "Firms will
have to be upfront about how much they charge for their services, and no longer
hide the cost of their advice behind the cost of a product."
The new policy will apply to the sale of investments such as pensions, annuities and unit
trusts, but not (at the present time) to mortgages and insurance policies.
|
|
|
|
Emphasis on Suitable Advice |
|
|
|
When the new rules start, financial advisers will have to charge their customers
directly for their services and will have to tell them exactly what their
charges are. The fundamental point is
that consumers will be able to see how much is charged for advice. Firms will
not be able to accept commission in return for recommending specific products.
According to the FSA, "Consumers will know what they are buying upfront, how
much it will cost them and also have the peace of mind that it was recommended
to suit their needs."
For decades the financial advice industry has thrived on salesmen earning
commission from insurance firms and fund mangers in return for advising clients
to invest in their policies. The sale of
policies is supposed to always be in the best interest of the customers.
But after looking into the matter for the
past four years the FSA has concluded that the system simply does not work.
"The changes also mean firms offering independent advice will have to
demonstrate that their recommendations are based on a comprehensive and unbiased
analysis of the market, and that any product selection is made in their clients'
best interests." This is similar to the
expanded fiduciary standards that are advocated in the
US
by the Financial Planning Coalition (a three-way consortium of fee-only advisors
at NAPFA, The CFP Board located in
Washington
, and the FPA located in
Denver
.The FSA spokesperson said, “However, if a firm chooses to limit their product range to
certain investments or strategies, then the services they offer are restricted,
and this should be clearly set out for customers."
|
|
|
|
Special Treatment for Banks |
|
|
|
If an adviser's charges are too expensive for a customers to pay in one go then
they can be given the option of spreading their payments over time and be
included with any other charges that might be levied, for instance by a fund
manager. "The fundamental point is that
consumers will be able to see how much is charged for advice," the FSA pointed
out. |
|
|
|
Widespread Impact on the Economy |
|
|
|
The changes may affect more than just the thousands of independent financial
advisers (IFAs) who make a living advising on and selling financial policies.
Banks and other lenders have also earned
billions of pounds in commission from insurers by selling their payment
protection insurance policies, designed ostensibly to help people pay credit
card bills, personal loans, hire-purchase agreements and mortgages if they fall
ill or lose their jobs.
These policies have been denounced by consumer groups for being little better
than a protection racket and their sale is in the course of being severely
restricted. These and other "pure
protection" policies, such as life and health insurance, can still be sold on a
commission basis (for the time being).
But the FSA said it was considering legislation to force salesmen to tell
customers that commission was involved and how much they were getting, if they
sold the policies alongside an investment. The
FSA's own consumer advice panel welcomed the regulator's announcement as a huge
step forward. "At last, the distortion
created by commission will be removed from investment advice," said Adam
Phillips, chairman of the Financial Services Consumer Panel.
The FSA Panel contends, "The FSA has stuck to its guns, and really has acted to protect
consumers and improve the system. Once
the new rules are in place, independent advice will have to be truly
independent, and not undermined by any commission paid by the product provider.
|
|
|
|
House not only
a home, says study |
|
|
Most current and soon-to-be
retirees view home equity not as a source of income but as insurance against
unplanned expenses.
That's the major finding of a recent poll of 2,673 individuals aged 50 to 65
conducted by Harris Interactive and the Center for Retirement Research at Boston
College.
Seventy-two percent of those surveyed had no plans to use home equity for
current income.
"But given that the retirement landscape is becoming more treacherous, that
picture may change," the report said. "Being inadequately prepared for
retirement, having to rely on a defined contribution plan, and having a
mortgage are all positively related to plans to tap home equity in retirement -
and these factors are all on the rise," the report added.
The survey report, "Do People Plan to Tap their Home Equity in Retirement?",
suggests that a similar survey conducted five years from now "will show
significantly more people planning to tap their housing equity to cover living
expenses in retirement."
|
|
|
 |
|  |
|
|